Why work with an EOR instead of starting your own entity?

December 1, 2023

Why work with an EOR instead of starting your own entity?
Toku Background Effect

Do you need an international employment partner?

Get Started

When global expansion is on the horizon for your team, the decision between working with an Employer of Record (EOR) or starting your own entity is pivotal. This choice impacts scalability, market entry speed, compliance with foreign regulations, HR capabilities, and exit strategies. This article delves into the factors influencing this decision, offering insights for businesses contemplating their global workforce management strategy.

Understanding the Decision: EOR vs. Own Entity

Compliance Management: Navigating diverse employment laws and tax regulations globally is a Herculean task. An EOR shoulders the legal responsibility for your workforce, ensuring compliance with local employment laws, tax regulations, and HR requirements, thus minimizing legal risks without stretching your resources thin. Conversely, establishing your entity demands a deep dive into local regulations, necessitating expert legal and accounting services.

Cost Considerations: Entity establishment usually incurs significant upfront costs alongside ongoing payroll and administrative expenses. For instance, setting up an entity in France might range from $100,000 to $200,000, while using WorkCo's EOR services can significantly cut your expenses down to a per-employee basis, presenting a more predictable and budget-friendly option.

Local Market Knowledge: Beyond legalities, understanding the local market, cultural nuances, and employee expectations is critical for successful operations. EOR services provide built-in local expertise, a valuable asset for businesses aiming for a culturally resonant and effective market entry.

Speed to Market: Rapid market entry is feasible with EOR services, allowing businesses to deploy resources swiftly without the delays associated with establishing a legal entity. This quick setup can be a game-changer in capturing market opportunities and establishing a presence before competitors.

Operational Control: While owning an entity offers complete control over back-office operations, aligning them with your company culture, it requires significant HR investments. EOR services, on the other hand, streamline global employment, reducing the strain on HR and legal teams while still ensuring a high-quality employee experience.

Scalability and Flexibility: EORs offer unparalleled hiring flexibility, enabling businesses to scale their workforce in response to market demands without the constraints of a rigid business structure. This adaptability fosters agility in global hiring strategies, essential for businesses aiming for rapid growth in new markets.

Risk Management: Choosing an EOR translates to lower risks by transferring legal and operational responsibilities to the provider, ideal for teams navigating unfamiliar regulations. Opting for an entity demands higher risk tolerance and a comprehensive risk management strategy.

The Bottom Line

The choice between an EOR and starting your own entity revolves around compliance management, cost efficiency, local market understanding, speed to market, operational control, scalability, risk management, and long-term regional commitment. Each option has its merits, but the decision ultimately aligns with your business's strategic objectives, risk appetite, and operational capabilities.

EOR services, like those offered by WorkCo, present a streamlined, risk-managed approach to global workforce management, ensuring compliance, flexibility, and rapid market entry. Whether you're leaning towards an EOR or contemplating entity setup, understanding your priorities and the implications of each choice is crucial for successful global expansion.

Disclaimer: This article is for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal or tax advice. Always consult with professional advisors before making decisions related to international employment and expansion.